<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dustin M. Wax &#187; tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dwax.org/tag/tools-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dwax.org</link>
	<description>writer, educator, anthropologist, and freelance thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Price of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://dwax.org/2007/08/08/the_price_of_knowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://dwax.org/2007/08/08/the_price_of_knowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[textbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me let you in on a little secret: <a href="http://www.affordabook.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.affordabook.com/?referer=');">college textbooks</a> in the US are grossly overpriced.  It's been shown time and again that the same books can cost much less in Canada and the UK, and can often be ordered for less even after adding the cost of international <a href="http://dwax.org/2007/08/08/the_price_of_knowledge/">[Continue reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me let you in on a little secret: <a href="http://www.affordabook.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.affordabook.com/?referer=');">college textbooks</a> in the US are grossly overpriced.  It&#8217;s been shown time and again that the same books can cost much less in Canada and the UK, and can often be ordered for less even after adding the cost of international shipping! Because they&#8217;re constantly revised (at least in part &#8212; most publishers won&#8217;t put out a new edition if it&#8217;s more than 30% changed from the last ones, because they have to lay out the whole thing over again!) it&#8217;s hard to get rid of textbooks, so you end up stuck with Introductory Chemistry when all you really care about is 17th century poetry.  </p>
<p>A coule years ago, I found a flyer in my campus mailbox, from one academic publisher or another telling me how to respond to students&#8217; complaints about textbook prices.  The thing is, publishers want you to <a href="http://www.affordabook.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.affordabook.com/?referer=');">buy textbooks</a> new, at full price; if they could, they&#8217;d outlaw the trade in <a href="http://www.affordabook.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.affordabook.com/?referer=');">used textbooks</a> altogether.  Even the Text and Academic Authors Association, of which I am a member, takes a strong stance against the sale of used textbooks which, after all, mean less royalties for authors. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not fair.  Our audience as academic authors &#8212; and the clientele of academic publishers &#8212; are college students, many of them struggling to keep their heads above water.  I teach some of my classes at a community college, where tuition is low &#8212; it is the cost of textbooks that causes many of my students to drop or to fail (because they try to go without books). If you&#8217;re writing for or publishing for college students, you have to respond at least a little to their needs &#8212; not act the role of the self-righteous victim because students naturally try to find the best deal they can, and not push unnecessary books into circulation when the ones published last year, or even 10 years ago, are still perfectly fine.  How much does Introductory Physics change in the 2 years between editions anyway?!</p>
<p>I make sure my textbooks are available in the bookstore, but I also try to find links to discounted or used copies online, and encourage students to find the <a href+http://www.affordabook.com/">cheapest textbook prices</a> they possibly can.  And I feel fine about that &#8212; my job is to teach social science, not to market the bookstore.  At the end of the day, fairness counts.
 </p>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size:8pt">Sponsored Post<br /><a href="http://www.blogsvertise.com/?rid=b3981" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.blogsvertise.com/?rid=b3981&amp;referer=');">Click Here to Advertise on My Blog</a></span></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h4>Related Thoughts:</h4><blockquote><ul><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2008/02/11/a_defense_of_used_books_at_the_text_and_academic_authors_association/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">A Defense of Used Books at the Text and Academic Authors Association</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2005/01/12/update_on_textbook_stickering_case/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Update on Textbook Stickering Case</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/08/03/tutorialism/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Tutorialism</a></li></ul></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dwax.org/2007/08/08/the_price_of_knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Apps for Students</title>
		<link>http://dwax.org/2007/06/25/online_apps_for_students/</link>
		<comments>http://dwax.org/2007/06/25/online_apps_for_students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read/Write Web has a great <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_backpack_web_apps_for_students.php" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_backpack_web_apps_for_students.php?referer=');">list of online applications for students</a>.  Online applications are generally free (at least for basic service, and upgraded services tend to be cheap), fairly easy to use, and most importantly are available wherever you have access to a <a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/25/online_apps_for_students/">[Continue reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read/Write Web has a great <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_backpack_web_apps_for_students.php" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_backpack_web_apps_for_students.php?referer=');">list of online applications for students</a>.  Online applications are generally free (at least for basic service, and upgraded services tend to be cheap), fairly easy to use, and most importantly are available wherever you have access to a computer.  Since students tend to move from their dorm room to computer labs to classrooms to friends&#8217; dorms to off-campus homes to Internet cafes to their parents&#8217; houses and so on, the fact that your work is just a login away wherever you happen to be can be a real help.  Here&#8217;s a tip: many of these services have plugins for Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.igoogle.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.igoogle.com?referer=');">iGoogle customizable homepage</a> (as well as for similar services like <a href="http://www.pageflakes.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pageflakes.com?referer=');">PageFlakes</a> and <a href="http://www.netvibes.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.netvibes.com?referer=');">NetVibes</a>) so you can construct a single &#8220;dashboard&#8221; where you can access your documents, your calendar, your notes, and so on.  </p>
<div id="crp_related"><h4>Related Thoughts:</h4><blockquote><ul><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2004/08/31/why_oh_why/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why Oh Why?</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/05/31/how_to_make_the_most_of_google_documents/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">How to make the most of Google Documents</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/07/best_practices_for_students_2_know_your_software/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Best Practices for Students #2: Know Your Software</a></li></ul></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dwax.org/2007/06/25/online_apps_for_students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Practices for Students #4: Outline</title>
		<link>http://dwax.org/2007/06/13/best_practices_for_students_4_outline/</link>
		<comments>http://dwax.org/2007/06/13/best_practices_for_students_4_outline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My, my, we do hate the idea of outlining, donâ€™t we? Most people think of an outline as a rigid straightjacket hampering the flow of true creativity.  But guess what â€“ the writers you admire most for their creativity almost without fail are outliners (and those that arenâ€™t are lying â€“ they most likely keep an outline in their heads and trust their memories to keep it straight).  The reason is simple â€“ an outline takes most of the work of organizing and structuring their writing off their shoulders, which means they are free to actually be <a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/13/best_practices_for_students_4_outline/">[Continue reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My, my, we do hate the idea of outlining, donâ€™t we? Most people think of an outline as a rigid straightjacket hampering the flow of true creativity.  But guess what â€“ the writers you admire most for their creativity almost without fail are outliners (and those that arenâ€™t are lying â€“ they most likely keep an outline in their heads and trust their memories to keep it straight).  The reason is simple â€“ an outline takes most of the work of organizing and structuring their writing off their shoulders, which means they are free to actually be creative.</p>
<p>A good outline is a map to your goals â€“ and like any good map, as you follow along youâ€™ll see new and often more interesting ways to get where youâ€™re going. But you wouldnâ€™t set off on a long journey without any map at all, would you? (The popularity of online services like Google Maps, Mapquest, and Yahoo Maps suggests not.)  An outline serves primarily as a reminder, helping you to keep the end goal in sight and to evaluate your progress along the way.  Itâ€™s also a pretty good charm against writerâ€™s block â€“ many prolific writers say that when they donâ€™t know what to write next, they just check their outline and crank out pages, however crappy.  Knowing what to do next helps bring them around to their next point, even if they have to detour a little to get there.  Thereâ€™s always editing (remember?).  </p>
<p>Of course, in high school, you were probably given a complicated set of Roman numerals, capital and lower-case letters, and numbers and sub-sets and superscripts andâ€¦ Forget all that.  An outline doesnâ€™t have to be any more complex than a list of points you want to cover and the order you want to cover them in.  The more detail you capture at the beginning of your project, though, the easier it will be to develop your work later on.  Once you have a list of topics, itâ€™s a good idea to go back and fill in some sub-topics, even sub-sub-topics.  I use a program called <a href="http://www.tranglos.com/free/keynote_main.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tranglos.com/free/keynote_main.html?referer=');">Keynote</a> for this, even though the author stopped updating it two years ago.  Keynote is an outliner program, with a nice text editor built in, so I can write the body of my article directly into my outline.  Itâ€™s a process of gradual accumulation: I list the topics I want to write on, then add sub-topics and sub-sub-topics, then crank through them one by one, writing a paragraph or two for each sub-topic.  Then I export the whole thing to Word (from the â€œFileâ€ menu), clean it up, and add a line here or there where the transition from one point to the next seems rocky.  </p>
<p>But you donâ€™t need specialized software to make a decent outline.  A piece of paper with some scribbled notes is good, too.  The point is to have <em>something</em>, some idea of what you want to write and how you want to write it, before you start writing in earnest.  Youâ€™ll find that once the outline is done, most of the thought process is finished â€“ the rest of the paper just flows into place.  And because youâ€™ve already worried about what facts are needed to support each part of your argument, you donâ€™t have to worry about it when youâ€™re writing â€“ which means you can focus on crafting wonderful, creative sentences.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h4>Related Thoughts:</h4><blockquote><ul><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/11/best_practices_for_students_3_spell-check_is_not_your_friend/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Best Practices for Students #3: Spell-check Is Not Your Friend!</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/01/the_art_of_proofreading/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Art of Proofreading</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/07/best_practices_for_students_2_know_your_software/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Best Practices for Students #2: Know Your Software</a></li></ul></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dwax.org/2007/06/13/best_practices_for_students_4_outline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Practices for Students #3: Spell-check Is Not Your Friend!</title>
		<link>http://dwax.org/2007/06/11/best_practices_for_students_3_spell-check_is_not_your_friend/</link>
		<comments>http://dwax.org/2007/06/11/best_practices_for_students_3_spell-check_is_not_your_friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conspiracy is afoot, my friends.  Microsoft is in on it, for sure, but theyâ€™re only the public face of what may be the vastest, most insidious plot to undermine Americaâ€™s credibility ever carried out.  Iâ€™m pretty sure the North Koreans are in on it, and the Teachersâ€™ Union.  And MTV, definitely.  Their plan: through the cunning manipulation of word processing software, particularly the spell-checking function, they hope to make Americans look stupid and awkward in front of the rest of the world.  

And itâ€™s <a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/11/best_practices_for_students_3_spell-check_is_not_your_friend/">[Continue reading]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conspiracy is afoot, my friends.  Microsoft is in on it, for sure, but theyâ€™re only the public face of what may be the vastest, most insidious plot to undermine Americaâ€™s credibility ever carried out.  Iâ€™m pretty sure the North Koreans are in on it, and the Teachersâ€™ Union.  And MTV, definitely.  Their plan: through the cunning manipulation of word processing software, particularly the spell-checking function, they hope to make Americans look stupid and awkward in front of the rest of the world.  </p>
<p>And itâ€™s working!</p>
<p>Hereâ€™s how it works: you finish a paper in the bleary-eyed dead of night, mere hours before itâ€™s due.  You hit the spell-check button, and run through your errors, generally hitting â€œchangeâ€, â€œchangeâ€, â€œchangeâ€ and on and on without really looking at the errors spell-check claims to have found or the changes it recommends.  When youâ€™re done, maybe you take a quick glance at the page â€“ no red squiggles? Good, youâ€™re golden.</p>
<p>Except, youâ€™re not.  Spell-check will catch the most obvious errors, but itâ€™s fairly blind to matters of context and subtlety.  All it does is check each word against a list of known words â€“ if a word in your text isnâ€™t on its list, it suggests the closest match.  For most college-level writing, you will be using words that will not be on its list â€“ these words have to be added to the dictionary manually, which requires a little more attention than the average last-minute proofreader can muster.  More than that, though, spell-check doesnâ€™t see a problem with a word thatâ€™s misspelled, as long as it still spells <em>something</em>.  (Word 2007 is supposed to have some ability to catch these words, but the program is still so new that the scope of its abilities arenâ€™t clear.  Plus, most people will be using pre-Office 2007 software â€“ either Office 2003 or XP, or WordPerfect, Works, or OpenOffice, which do not handle contextual misspellings.)</p>
<p>This is where you start to look stupid.  If you write â€œTheir are three things you should have in youâ€™re bag at all timesâ€, spell-check thinks thatâ€™s fine.  Your human audience, however â€“ your professor, maybe fellow students, maybe a college admissions committee, or whomever â€“ wonâ€™t think youâ€™re fine, theyâ€™ll think youâ€™re a bit slow, lacking a basic command of the English language.  This is <em>especially</em> embarrassing if English is your <em>native</em> language! </p>
<p>The conspirators are counting on this â€“ they want you to look silly, and nothing looks sillier than not knowing the difference between â€œareâ€ and â€œourâ€.  But, of course, you claim that you actually <em>do</em> know the difference â€“ and you probably do, but what good does that do you? Prospective employers wonâ€™t ask, nor will grad school admission boards, nor anyone else.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the folks at Microsoft and their Korean co-conspirators are laughing and laughing, even as they shift their investment portfolios out of American companies and into Indian and Turkish corporations â€“ knowing that the Turks and Indians will be more than prepared to step in with clearly-written language when America crumbles under the weight of its own mockability.  </p>
<p>There are, of course, things we can do to prevent this future from unfolding and to stop this global conspiracy in its tracks.  First of all, know your tools; understand how spell-check works and how to make changes to its functionality.  For instance, if thereâ€™s words you mistype a lot, did you know you can add them to Wordâ€™s auto-correct list? (Other programs that auto-correct likely have the same ability.)  Some years ago, I worked in a museum.  Because of my letâ€™s call it â€œunorthodoxâ€ typing style, I tend to mistype the word â€œmuseumâ€ as â€œmsueumâ€.  Kind of a problem, right? No big deal, though â€“ I just opened Wordâ€™s options and added my goofy spelling to the list, requesting that every time I type that abomination, Word simply replace it with â€œmuseumâ€.  From then on, all was well in the world: I received medals and plaques for excellence in spelling the name of the organization consistently, the museum received grants and gifts because of the fine treatment of its name on grant applications and other communications, overnight art became literally the single most important thing to the worldâ€™s citizens.  Thatâ€™s why thereâ€™s no more reality shows.</p>
<p>OK, back to reality now: another thing you can do to prevent the imminent outsourcing of your future jobs to Nigeria, where well-formed English flows like sweetened tea from the tongues of the locals, is toâ€¦ OK, youâ€™re not going to like this.  So sit down, grab your comfort blanket, and take a deep breath.  The other thing is to finish your work at least a day early and then proofread it before itâ€™s due.  Better yet, have someone you trust â€“ that is, someone who can tell you how dumb you are without it hurting your feelings; this is an excellent test of the strength and quality of your relationships, by the way â€“ read your work and tell you what mistakes youâ€™ve made.  Note: this only works if your reader can spell.</p>
<p>If it were only your future at risk, I wouldnâ€™t bother here.  Surely some smart student in your classes will realize what youâ€™re doing to yourself and position herself or himself accordingly to make sure that your goals and dreams land squarely on her or his shoulders.  Thatâ€™s no big deal (for her or him, anyway â€“ it might upset you a bit, but thatâ€™s competition for you.  Whatâ€™re you gonna do?).  Unfortunately, with the future of the free world hanging on your willingness to create well-crafted prose, I feel obligated to intervene here.  If you want Bill Gates, Kim Jong-Il, and the 14-year old Chinese kids who will write the futureâ€™s business requirement documents, requests for proposal, and grants for a tenth of what youâ€™d charge to win, by all means, keep using spell-check as your only line of defense against typos.  But if you care at all about the world youâ€™re in, please, I beg you â€“ your country begs you! â€“ be just a little more careful with the typos.</p>
<p>Special super-bonus reading:  <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39273376,00.htm?r=94" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0_1000000308_39273376_00.htm?r=94&amp;referer=');">10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid</a></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h4>Related Thoughts:</h4><blockquote><ul><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/13/best_practices_for_students_4_outline/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Best Practices for Students #4: Outline</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/07/best_practices_for_students_2_know_your_software/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Best Practices for Students #2: Know Your Software</a></li><li><a href="http://dwax.org/2007/06/01/the_art_of_proofreading/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Art of Proofreading</a></li></ul></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dwax.org/2007/06/11/best_practices_for_students_3_spell-check_is_not_your_friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
