From “Extreme Academia”
American Lecture Idol
Paula: “Fabulous! So what if they didn’t understand the concept of the postmodern rejection of absolute truth? You gave it your all, and that’s what counts.”
Randy: “Dawg, it was ai’ight, it was ai’ight. A little pitchy in the Richard Rorty section, which isn’t the material I would have chosen for you. But you were you, man. You were definitely you.”
Simon: “Frankly, I preferred Clay’s presentation on gender ambiguity. Have you considered a career as a book editor?”
[Continue reading]
Hilary Clinton was the first female board-member of Wal-Mart. Q.V.:Back when she was first lady of Arkansas, Hillary Clinton became the first woman appointed to the Wal-Mart board, and tried to get the company to hire more women managers, but that effort apparently went the way of national health insurance. [Continue reading]
From BoingBoing comes this story North Korean government’s efforts to promote short hair about the among its citizenry:
The government of North Korea has launched a series of television public service announcements called “Let Us Trim Our Hair In Accordance With Socialist Lifestyle!”
Snip from a BBC News story on the campaign: “It stressed the ‘negative effects’ of long hair on ‘human intelligence development,’ noting that long hair ‘consumes a great deal of nutrition’ and could thus rob the brain of energy.”
Here’s a thousand words by way of response:
 [Continue reading]
If you’re Jewish and between 18 and 26 years old, Mayanot/birthright israel will fly you to Israel for a 10-day tour, absolutely free. The trip to Israel is a Big Thing for Jewish folks, particularly in the “Jewish Crescent” (what the goyim call the Northeast Corridor) — I remember once when I was on a temp assignment at Hadassah (the Women’s Zionist Organization of America), I was introduced to the organization’s librarian, whose first words to me were “Have you been to Israel yet?” I hadn’t, and still haven’t, for a number of reasons. Jewish identity didn’t come easily to me — I spent my formative years denying it explicitly, mostly out of a pervasive disjoint between myself and religious thinking. It wasn’t until I was in my mid-twenties and began reading the literature of the Holocaust and of the Lower East Side that I began to understand that there was a heritage here separate from the religion itself, a realization that immediately put me in the camp of the “secular” or “cultural Jews”. What’s more, a big part of this took place in opposition to the pro-Israeli, Zionist Judaism that, as a New Yorker at the time, I was surrounded with. My own feelings ran towards the Bundists’: engagement with the problems of the diaspora, not disengagement and escape towards a Promised Land. So to be honest, I probably wouldn’t have taken them up on this offer even if I was still under 26. Israel has little to do with my understanding of Judaism or of myself as a Jew — and that little is predominantly negative. What’s more, the security requirements of the trip (and do be sure to check out the security precautions) require the tour give a wide berth to hotspots like the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, meaning that an important part of the Israeli experience is ignored. (Bonus link: Have a look at the Onion’s archived front page from November 9, 1948, particularly the headline, “War-Weary Jews Establish Homeland Between Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt”.) To me, the settlements and retributive bombings and bulldozings and checkpoints and so on are of a piece with the Zionist ideology — they wanted to be a nation-state, and nation-states are defined by their use of coercive force against external threats and internally in the construction and regualtion of a “national” identity. To American Jews, remote from the threat of daily violence that shapes Israeli identity, these tours seem (to me, of course) to offer a stunted, attenuated image of the Zionist mission. I won’t go so far as to say the intent is to brainwash impressionable American Jews, but I will say I think the tours offer an unrealistically optimistic idea of what Israel offers to world Jewry. [Continue reading]
I’m not usually much for conspiracy theories and the like, but why is it that a Google Image Search for “abu ghraib” doesn’t turn up any images of torture at Abu Ghraib? Even adding the word “torture” to the search doesn’t return any of the images we are now familiar with (or anything else torture-related, for that matter)? Seems weird — Google is usually a search engine that can be counted on to return appropriate results… [Continue reading]
OK, Bush won. Fair and square — or not. The last 4 years have shown that it doesn’t really matter, as long as Bush’s ass ends up warming the chair in the Oval Office. Like many, I really, really, really REALLY didn’t want to see a second Bush term. Not that I was particularly enthralled with Kerry — he was better than he seemed at first glance, but certainly wasn’t offering the kind of radical change I think this country needs. But still, he was someone I felt we linkies could work with, someone who would at least open his eyes and ears (and maybe even his heart) to the American public now and again, and even act on what he saw, heard, and felt coming from us. But — and this is strange as all hell — while watching the Bush victory speech today, I felt… I dunno, almost joyous, for a brief moment. It’s part of the ritual for the losing candidate to declare that “the fight’s not over” and that he will “keep fighting for the American people”, so although Edwards gave me warm fuzzies, I wasn’t particularly reassured. Gore promised the same thing, remember? And where has Gore been hiding for the last 4 years? But watching Bush play out the role of the gracious winner (yeah, right) I did feel this moment of elation — this isn’t over. We’ve been given a chance, at long last, to shrug off the dead weight of the Democratic Party, the way I see it. In 2000, the Dems could, rightly or (I think) wrongly, point to Nader and somehow convince themselves that their own wishy-washy politics weren’t to blame for the loss. This time around, we’ve seen an overwhelming desire for change. Bush didn’t win this, any more than Kerry did — nobody wants either of them in office, as far as I can tell. As far as I can tell, Bush stayed in office because a) he’s the evil we already know, while Kerry is the evil we don’t know, and b) in the absence of any moral core to current American politics, a lot of Americans were willing to substitute for the cheap replacement for morality offered by Bush. It seems to me that the field is now open for whoever can present a set of real issues — things that directly touch the lives of Americans in real, tangible ways — grounded in a real moral vision. Not a moralistic vision, mind you — a real sense of right and wrong and of the subtleties and difficulties involved in choosing well. More than that, though, I think it’s time that candidates, politicians, and engaged participants (that’s us citizen-types, y’know?) start addressing voters as individuals (what could be more American?) than as representatives of various voting blocs: blacks, working mothers, NASCAR dads, evangelical Christians, cultural liberals, etc. I’m not sure the Democratic Party has anything to do with this kind of future. I’ve kind of resigned myself to the impracticality of third-party solutions on the national stage, given the demands of modern politicking. So what I’m really advicating — what struck me as Bush platituded his way through his speech — is the creation of a second party, a real alternative to the Republican machine that, sooner or later, cultural conservatives are going to realize is using them as a smokescreen for the dissolution of the American government. I’m willing to entertain the notion that this is just crazy-talk. It may be that, after a brief high, alcoholism returns as the only rational response to a Bush presidency. But I don’t think it’s all crazy-talk. There hasn’t been a real issue discussed on the American political scene in a long, long time. Gay marriage is not an issue, it’s a campaign ploy! What we’re not talking about is who is making the decisions that shape our daily lives — and here’s a hint: it’s neither us nor our government. Real issues might not play well on TV — but shit, we got the Internets now, right? And I think we’ve got to take a big step back, to the early days of the Dean campaign, when the promise of the Internet seemed about to take root. We’ve got two years before the next elections, and an electorate that’s actually excited about the democratic process for the first time in decades — seems to me that we’ve got a lot to work with, no? [Continue reading]
Going through some back posts the other day, I came across this post, written in the first few days of the war on Iraq, that seems eerily prescient. OK, I’m not really a genius (well, not based on this, anyway) — the thing is, it was so very easy for right-minded folks to see exactly where the invasion of Iraq would take us, making the surprise expressed by our media and co-Americans seem all too unlikely. Listen:
What is the objective of military intervention? The administration says “regime change” but hasn’t given anything but the fuzziest idea of what to change the regime to. They’d like “democracy” but have assured the Turks it won’t be too democratic. The big question is, how will we know when we’ve won? It was my understanding that the rise of Powell in the administration signaled an acceptance of his admonition to have clear military objectives and a clear exit strategy, but I don’t see how military tactics in Iraq relate to the goal of establishing “democracy” in the region. Will we be done when Saddam’s head is on a pike outside the Presidential Palace? The administration has been indicating that this is, indeed, the goal, but even they must see that we won’t have created anything but chaos at that point. Will we be done when an interim government is put in place in Baghdad, as was done earlier in Kabul? We don’t seem to be done in Afghanistan, at least as far as military action is concerned (our resolve to establish “democracy” there seems to have flagged, however). Will we be done when contracts for rebuilding are issued to American corporations? Given the amount of tension this is likely to create among Iraqis cut out of the rebuilding process, I imagine they’ll have to work in the protective involvement of the American military. Will we be done when we’ve conclusively demonstrated the existence of the so-far-invisible Iraqi WMD development efforts? What if it turns out, as seems likely, that we were wrong, and there simply aren’t any WMDs? Will we be done when we bring our troops home? Trust me, we will never be bringing our troops home. (emphasis added; corrected for typos)
[Continue reading]
[[image:onenationsm.jpg:Republican Flyer — small:center:0]]
Click for larger image
It’s Swing State time here in Nevada, which means every day my mailbox is chock-a-block full of flyers from both Republicans and Democrats. Today, I got a flyer exhorting me to “Vote Republican” next Tuesday, from the party whose presidential candidate seemed very upset, during the debates, about the idea that “under God” might be dropped from the “Pledge of Allegiance”. What’s interesting is that the slogan on the flyer, the little catchphrase that’s sposed to fire up my patriotic sensibility and get me to vote for the party that aims to protect my right to impose on atheists and other non-Christian folks a particular conceptualization of a supernatural being watching over this nation and its interests, this slogan printed in big, glowy letters, says: ONE NATION…With liberty and justice for all. Where’s the Bearded One? There’s an ellipsis there to show me that words were removed, and I’m well-educated enough to know what words those are, too — those Republicans don’t know who they’re dealing with! (Though, to be fair, after what they’ve done to education, I spose they figgered they could count on people not going in for reading and all that.) [Continue reading]
I know, I know — Borders is Evil. Support local independents, by all means. I moved last month, and am pleased to find that a local used bookstore, Dead Poets Books, moved too, and right up the street! But sometimes there’s a book that just hasn’t made it into the stock of your local used bookstore, and Vegas is really not hip to the whole “independent bookseller” thing, so it’s Borders and B&N for me, or no bookstores at all. And normally it’s no new bookstores — I can be pretty happy with just used bookstores and the Web for new books, when I absolutely positively *must* have some new release (Walter Mosley comes to mind). But this weekend it’s Education Day at Borders, so educators — among whose exalted ranks I count myself — get a whopping 25% off their (our) purchases. Given that the bulk of our society, for all the lip service it gives to “Leaving No Child Behind” and all that, sees actual educators as only a step away from prostitutes moonlighting as terrorists, it’s refreshing to know that there is at least one place where, for a couple days out of the year anyway, we can get a little respect. Before, you know, going back to bilking taxpayers out of their hard-earned money, training their children to hate America, and securing entirely unreasonable stashes of WMDs to use against the government. [Continue reading]
Why are telecoms so behind the curve when it comes to the web? AT&T Wireless’ website is a horror — mMode services are handled separately from other wireless services, a query I once made on how to access my voicemail from a landline got dozens of separate results for how to access voicemail wirelessly from every model of phone AT&T services (this despite the fact that the phone I actually use is recorded in my profile — and despite the fact that on every phone the answer is “press and hold the ‘1’ button”), and so on. I ended up googling up the answer, which I found (fairly easily) on a non-AT&T site. Right now, I’ve been up all night transferring services from my current address to my new address, or starting new services. I’ve started Cox cable high-speed Internet and Southwest Gas services (my current place is electric-only), and I’ve transferred my Nevada Power account as well. So all that’s left (other than change-of-addresses with my bank, renter’s insurance, and wireless) is to transfer my Sprint local service and cancel my DSL (which my new landlord tells me will interfere with the alarm system in the new place). So I head to Sprint’s website (which doesn’t work with Opera, so I have to open IE) and look up FAQs on customer service. The answer to all FAQs involved with moving, changing, or cancelling Sprint services online is the same:
This feature is currently not offered online. Please call the Sprint Local business office at 1-888-723-8010 for assistance.
So while the power utilities totally get the web, not one but two telecommunication companies are totally lost. Which isn’t very heartening, is it — after all, the Internet is a freakin’ telecommunications application!!!!! Sigh. [Continue reading]
|
|
![[[image:onenationsm.jpg:Republican Flyer — small:center:0]]](images/onenation.jpg){kind=link}